KLGKleyman Law GroupBusiness & Litigation Attorneys

When a Partner, Officer, or Director Breaches a Fiduciary Duty

When you went into business with a partner, brought on an officer, or handed a manager the keys, you trusted that person to put the company first. A fiduciary breach is what happens when they use that position to serve themselves instead. It rarely shows up as obvious theft. The early signs are quieter: money that moves without a clear reason, or a partner who stops sharing what the other owners are entitled to see.

This is one of the strongest claims a New York business owner has, because the law holds people in positions of trust to a higher standard than ordinary business dealing. Knowing what counts as a breach, and what you can actually do about it, is the difference between recovering what you lost and watching it disappear.

What Counts as a Breach of Fiduciary Duty

A fiduciary is someone the law trusts to act for another's benefit, not their own. Inside a business, that describes partners to each other, the managers and members of an LLC, and the officers and directors of a corporation. The duty runs to the company and, depending on the role, to the other owners.

A breach happens when that person puts their own interest ahead of the duty they owe. New York courts treat this as one of the highest standards the law recognizes, stricter than the ordinary give-and-take of arm's length business. A fiduciary isn't simply expected to avoid outright theft. They're expected to deal openly, disclose conflicts, and decline to profit at the company's expense, even when no contract spells that out.

Proving a Breach: Three Elements

To win a claim, an owner generally has to show three things: that a fiduciary relationship existed, that the fiduciary breached the duty that came with it, and that the breach caused real harm. Each piece carries weight. A relationship without a provable breach goes nowhere, and a breach without measurable damage gives a court little to award.

A business owner reviewing company financial records, the point where a fiduciary breach comes into focus.

How Fiduciaries Breach the Duty of Loyalty

New York courts sort fiduciary breach claims into a small set of recurring conduct patterns, each with its own doctrine and its own proof requirements. The four below account for the bulk of the claims business owners bring, and the category the conduct falls into determines both what must be proven and which remedies are available.

Misappropriation of Company Funds

Misappropriation is among the most frequently litigated fiduciary breaches in New York. A partner who routes company money into their own pocket, or pays themselves through inflated salary, bonuses, or reimbursed expenses while distributions to the other owners stop, has converted company assets. The diversion itself is the breach; a fiduciary's belief that they earned the money is not a defense.

Usurping a Corporate Opportunity

The corporate opportunity doctrine bars a fiduciary from taking for themselves a business opportunity the company was positioned to pursue. An officer who learns of an incoming contract or client and steers it to a side business they own generally owes the company the resulting profit. Advance disclosure and approval by the disinterested owners is the only reliable safe harbor for a deal of this kind.

Competing While Still Owing Loyalty

A fiduciary generally may not compete with the company while still serving it. A managing member who forms a rival entity and begins moving customers, employees, or vendors before resigning breaches the duty of loyalty even where no contract contains a non-compete. Mere preparation to compete is treated more leniently than active competition, and that line is where most of these cases are decided.

Undisclosed Self-Dealing

An interested transaction is a deal the fiduciary sits on both sides of, setting terms that pay them personally. New York does not void these transactions automatically, but an undisclosed conflict generally shifts the burden to the fiduciary to prove the deal was fair to the company. Disclosure to, and approval by, disinterested decision-makers is what separates a lawful transaction from a breach.

Two patterns travel alongside these four. A controlling owner who cuts a minority holder out of information, meetings, and money to force a cheap exit commits the conduct at the center of minority shareholder oppression claims, which rest on the same duty of loyalty. And owners generally hold a right to inspect the company's books and records, so a partner who blocks that access is, in most cases, concealing one of the patterns above.

What the Fiduciary Duties of Loyalty and Care Mean

New York divides a fiduciary's obligation into a duty of loyalty and a duty of care. Courts in this state hold fiduciaries to a stricter standard of conduct than the ordinary give-and-take of the marketplace, and a breach of either duty can support a claim, though the two are proven differently and carry different remedies.

Loyalty

Undivided allegiance to the company. The claim is proven by showing the fiduciary held a conflict of interest; the burden then generally shifts to the fiduciary to justify the transaction, not to the owners to condemn it.

A fiduciary generally may not take a personal benefit from their position unless the other owners knew of it and approved it, and the four conduct patterns above are this duty's main applications. The remedies run wider here than in most of business litigation: a disloyal fiduciary can be ordered to surrender the profit the breach produced even where the company cannot prove a matching loss of its own.

Care

Informed decision-making in good faith. The claim is judged by the process behind the decision, never its outcome in hindsight, and liability generally requires gross negligence or bad faith.

New York's business judgment rule shields a decision made honestly, on reasonable information, and free of self-interest, even where the decision lost money. That protection ends where the fiduciary ignored obvious warning signs, or committed the company to a major transaction without learning its basic terms, and outside the rule the fiduciary answers for the result.

A duty of candor runs beneath both. Concealing a conflict, or withholding information the other owners were entitled to receive, is frequently itself the breach, and a fiduciary who disclosed and obtained approval stands in a materially stronger position than one who stayed silent.

Who Owes a Fiduciary Duty in a Business

Not every business relationship carries a fiduciary duty, so the first question is always who actually owes one. Partners owe it to each other and to the partnership. The managing members and managers of an LLC owe it to the company and to the other members. Corporate officers and directors owe it to the corporation and its shareholders. A controlling or majority owner who runs the company can owe it to the minority, which is where many partner and shareholder disputes begin.

The common thread is power and reliance. One person holds discretion over money, decisions, or information, and the others depend on them to use it fairly. The more control a role carries, the heavier the duty that comes with it.

Where the relationship is purely contractual, two companies dealing at arm's length, there's usually no fiduciary duty at all, only whatever the contract says. That line often decides whether you have a breach of contract claim or the broader fiduciary one, and the difference changes both the proof you need and the remedies available to you.

Remedies for a Fiduciary Breach in New York

New York offers owners several remedies for a fiduciary breach, and they reach beyond compensation for a loss. Once self-dealing or disloyalty is shown, the burden shifts to the fiduciary to prove the challenged transaction was fair in both process and price.

1

Damages

A court can award compensatory damages measured to restore the company or its owners to the financial position they would have held had the duty been kept. The figure turns on the loss the breach caused, not on the fiduciary's gain.

2

Disgorgement of Profit

A disloyal fiduciary can be ordered to surrender the profit the breach produced even where the company proves no matching loss of its own. New York's faithless servant doctrine can go further, forcing a disloyal agent or employee to forfeit the compensation earned from the first disloyal act forward.

3

Constructive Trust

Where company funds were used to acquire or build an asset, a court can impose a constructive trust and treat that asset as the company's, whatever name holds title. The remedy follows the money into whatever it became, so long as it can still be traced.

4

Injunction

When the harm is ongoing, a court can enjoin it: barring further self-dealing, freezing the misuse of confidential information, or halting competition drawn from the company. Injunctive relief reaches conduct that a later damages award could not undo.

5

Removal

In serious cases a court can remove the fiduciary from their role, ending the control over money and decisions the breach relied on. Removal generally requires misconduct beyond an ordinary disagreement, and where it isn't enough, a forced buyout or dissolution can end the relationship outright.

For partners, procedure matters. While a partnership is still operating, New York generally channels these disputes into an action for an accounting rather than a direct damages suit between partners. An accounting compels the wrongdoer to open the books and account for every dollar, and it often reaches both the facts and the recovery in one proceeding.

Proving a Breach and the Statute of Limitations

Fiduciary claims are won on documentation. The records that matter are the ones showing where the money went and what the fiduciary knew: bank and credit card statements, internal emails and texts, board or member minutes, the contracts that were signed or quietly steered away, and the company's own financials. Start saving all of it now, somewhere the other side can't reach or delete.

Candor weighs as heavily as the documents. A fiduciary who buried a conflict sits in a far worse position than one who disclosed it and got sign-off. After that, almost everything rides on how fast you move.

Fiduciary claims carry time limits, and they vary with the type of conduct, so the safe assumption is that the clock started before you noticed. The practical problem is sharper than the legal one. A fiduciary comfortable enough to self-deal is usually comfortable enough to clean up after it, and the longer the conduct runs, the more it reads as the ordinary way the company has always operated. Acting early is less about the statute and more about reaching the money before it scatters and the records before they get tidied.

Fiduciary Duty Questions Owners Ask

A breach of contract is the failure to do what an agreement promised. A fiduciary breach is the violation of a duty of trust the law imposes on partners, officers, directors, and managers, whether or not a contract mentions it. Fiduciary claims reach conduct a contract never addressed, and they open the door to remedies like disgorgement of profits and an accounting.

Often yes, but the form matters. While the partnership is still operating, New York usually directs these disputes into an action for an accounting rather than a direct damages suit between partners. The underlying conduct, self-dealing, diverting funds, or competing against the business, can still support the claim. A lawyer can tell you which path applies before you file.

Depending on the facts, a court can award the losses the breach caused, force the fiduciary to surrender profits made through the disloyalty, impose a constructive trust on assets bought with company money, order an injunction to stop ongoing harm, and in serious cases remove the fiduciary. Punitive damages are rare and generally require fraud or willful misconduct.

Owners generally have a right to inspect company books and records, and a flat refusal is a serious warning sign. The denial itself can support a claim, and it often signals other breaches hiding in the numbers. Putting the request in writing and keeping a copy is usually the right first step.

We serve business owners in Brooklyn, Queens, Manhattan, and Staten Island.

Suspect a Fiduciary Breach? Talk to a Lawyer.

We represent New York business owners in disputes with partners, officers, and directors who put themselves ahead of the company.